Waterfox browser download

When it comes to looks and extras, Waterfox doesn't disappoint in a side-by-side comparison with the latest Firefox release. Waterfox has a family resemblance to other Mozilla-based browsers, with a dark blue Start button instead of Firefox's orange.

Otherwise, Waterfox looks and functions like Firefox, including its various customizable features and options. Our add-ons, extensions, and plug-ins worked in Waterfox, too, including Microsoft's Office and Silverlight plug-ins. Waterfox also has regular updates. We could tell with just a few quick trips to familiar sites that Waterfox is fast, so we visited some of our favorite browser speed test sites to see how it stacks up against the competition, including Firefox and our current default, Chrome.

For the most revealing results, we threw Peacekeeper's HTML5 torture test at each, pitting Waterfox against the site's Chrome benchmark and our own copy of Chrome. This online benchmarking tool separates the smartphones from the gaming desktops with a series of increasingly grueling tests that took some 5 minutes to run through. Waterfox bested Firefox but not Chrome, both in speed and HTML5-rendering capability, though the results were close enough to make it a matter of choice.

Chrome held a consistent edge, but Waterfox is fast, too. Subjectively, it "feels" fast, which might be the advantages of bit operation. In any case, we like Waterfox a lot. If you prefer Firefox but run bit Windows, give Waterfox a try. Free YouTube Downloader. IObit Uninstaller. WinRAR bit. Internet Download Manager. VLC Media Player. MacX YouTube Downloader. The program was created by the developer as a freeware product, but donations for the continued development are highly appreciated.

You may generally make a donation via the developer's main web site. We have tested Waterfox G4. We certify that this program is clean of viruses, malware and trojans. Additionally, companies get acquired all the time.

The acquiring company doesn't always follow the same user privacy practices that the asset company had in place -- case in point is the Facebook acquisition of Oculus. Non-profits, such as Mozilla, can't be bought. Ultimately, you'll need to evaluate if you're willing to trust System1 in the first place.

This is especially true for users looking to move away from Mozilla Firefox due to the amounts of telemetry that can be found within the browser's source code. Allegedly, Waterfox was once available on Android. However, as we noted before, it looks like development for it has stalled. There is no iOS version of Waterfox and there doesn't seem to be any development plans for iOS in the near future. At least, for now.

Additionally, the lack of mobile support makes the 'Sync' feature of Waterfox kind of lackluster. For users that are more interested in an easy and 'out-of-the-box' privacy browser experience, Waterfox doesn't fit that bill. However this isn't a con unique to Waterfox. Many other notable privacy browsers, such as Firefox itself and Ungoogled Chromium don't come totally configured for privacy without tweaks or the help of browser plugins. Ultimately, this means that you'll need to run through the main options menu s , perform some about:config tweaks, and download trusted privacy-friendly browser plugins.

Overall, the Waterfox browser as a piece of software itself is respectable and not a 'bad' pick as far as privacy goes. It has humble roots, and has been around as an 'ethical' browser for over 10 years. It has proven trustworthy as an alternative browser - at least, in the past.

It's also worthy mentioning one of the better maintained Firefox forks available out there, since it receive regular updates as the team behind Firefox rolls them out. This differs from other forks such as Pale Moon, which has effectively become its own browser because it runs on a separate engine. While the lack of mobile development can be a big issue for some users, I would say that the core of the issue with Waterfox is the company, System1, that is now behind it.

Can we trust them? Will they try to pull the wool over our eyes? Only time will tell I doubt blame anyone for not wanting to use Waterfox because of the company that's now behind it. After all, in that specific area, it's not too different from Brave. Not all patches apply cleanly or apply at all - but our better judgement is used. You can view unapplied security patches here. The default search is fairly privacy friendly. Waterfox Classic Download Waterfox Classic With these changes, can Waterfox be a viable privacy-focused browser?

Let's do our best to find out. Overview Here's Waterfox at a glance More info Still needs about:config tweaks found in Mozilla Firefox to be a more 'true' privacy browser Nonexistent mobile support this may be a con for some people What is Waterfox? To me, it seems to just be a game of semantics, but I digress.

System1 Acquisition Waterfox was acquired by System1 in December Requirements There are minimum system requirements for running this browser. One of them is Waterfox. This online browser built on Firefox gives you all the advantages of this browser, with a number of other capabilities. This includes customization features, security options, a tab-based interface, and the opening of multiple pages. At the same time, your computer resources will not be wasted.

The browser has also been designed with the user in mind and is really simple and easy to use. First of all, it will present you with all the same customization options that you would also find in Firefox, although you will need to match requirements within requirements to bring some to your interface. You can use the built-in private browsing options with proxy connections inside, as well as a password manager that will help you store your passwords if you forget one.